There’s an old saying that any publicity is good publicity, and in that vein, it’s been a good week for Major League Baseball. The debate around the Hall of Fame voting has certainly brought attention to the sport on shows that normally don’t talk about the sport.

We are a “small Hall” person. Cooperstown is the most difficult Hall of Fame to gain admittance to, and that’s fine. You should be a great player to be enshrined there.

Unfortunately, the social media era has changed things. Many voters are shamed according to who they vote for or don’t vote for. That’s wrong. The person voting earned a vote by covering baseball for many years and they are entitled to their opinion, something that isn’t taken into consideration these days.

Should some broadcasters be given a vote? People who cover the sport on a daily basis should obviously be considered along with writers. No problem with that at all.

One continuing controversy is what to do with the players who used PED’s. We feel they should not be included in the Hall. We hear the argument that many of these players were great before they started to enhance their performance, so they should be enshrined.

Try that argument on your significant other.

And please don’t use the tact that some PED users are already in Cooperstown. It’s a bad argument. It’s the same as using the fact that Rabbit Maranville (look it up) and his .258 batting average (658 OPS) are in the Hall, so others with similar statistics should be in.

That the writers (in this case) made a mistake does not mean more mistakes should be made.

We find it fascinating that people don’t vote for Curt Schilling because of things he has said or written, which gave him no advantage on the playing field, but vote for Bonds or Clemens. Bonds made himself a player you basically couldn’t pitch to after he turned 35 years old.

His best years were ages 36-39. That’s not unusual?

Look, we wouldn’t want to hang around with Schilling, and understand his views make a lot of people uncomfortable. But he’s a Hall of Fame pitcher, and despite his wishes about not wanting to be on the ballot next year, we are hoping he gets elected in 2022.

The writers do make mistakes. As Tribe fans, one of them that we hope gets rectified by the Veteran’s Committee is Kenny Lofton. The leadoff man on the great Indian teams of the ’90’s received just 3.2% of the vote in his first year of eligibility in 2013 and was removed from future ballots.

However, Lofton deserves the nod. With a .299 lifetime batting average and a .372 career on base percentage along with 2428 hits, we think Lofton was overlooked because he played in the same era as the greatest leadoff man of all time, Rickey Henderson.

It took Tim Raines, a similar player, ten years to get in. In fact, of the top ten similar hitters to Lofton (according to Baseball Reference.com), four are in the Hall, and a fifth, Ichiro Suzuki, will be.

The Veterans Committee has made mistakes too. The selection of Harold Baines raised some eyebrows.

For what it’s worth, if we had a vote, we would have voted for Schilling and Jeff Kent. That’s it.

The point is voting for the Hall of Fame is a subjective process. And because of sports, it should be fun to have arguments about it. It’s also a privilege for the writers who participate, and most of them take it very seriously.

A small Hall is fine for us. We’d rather that than the NFL’s method of putting in a lot of players simply because they now work on the broadcast side of things.