We recently read John Miller’s outstanding book The Last Manager, about Earl Weaver, the great manager of the Baltimore Orioles from 1968-82, during which the Orioles were the best organization in the sport, winning World Series once and two other American League pennants.
He had a .583 winning percentage as the skipper and was one of the first, if not the first, manager to use statistics, keeping track of how individual hitters did against different pitchers and making out his lineup accordingly, even though to others, the moves didn’t make sense.
The book is called the last manager because baseball is certainly different today. The front offices around the sport have more and more influence on how a roster is used, so although Cleveland fans wonder why Steven Vogt has a certain person in the lineup, keep in mind that it is more likely an organizational decision, not just Vogt’s.
Making decisions on a hunch is gone. And like many things about baseball and all of professional sports for that matter, change is not always for the good.
We say that because Vogt has come over more criticism this year it seems. First, any manager would be under more scrutiny when every game they play is decided by one or two runs, which is most Guardians’ games are decided by. So, pitching changes, who pinch hits, and when substitutions are made seem to be amplified when Cleveland loses 3-2.
These same decisions wouldn’t be a blip on the radar if the Guardians won 7-1. That’s just how it is.
What happens is managers today become robots. The game becomes sort of scripted, pre-planned if you will and only something weird causes the script to be altered. For example, we think the Guardians in their pregame meetings go over scenarios where they believe it will be advantageous for say Rhys Hoskins to bat for Kyle Manzardo.
It doesn’t matter if Manzardo has gone 3 for 3 in the game, with say a double and two home runs, if a certain pitcher comes in that Hoskins has had success, or should have success, he will likely pinch hit.
To most fans and reporters, that seems crazy, but that’s the way it is.
It’s also why a player goes 3 for 4 today but is out of the lineup tomorrow. Sometimes it’s a planned day off for the player, but we still think the player would (or may) go to the skipper and say he feels good and wants in. But it likely won’t happen.
When teams make a strange move on firing a manager, it’s more likely that decision is made because he is no longer aligned with the front office on who should play and who shouldn’t rather than he lost his connection with the players.
Also, the front office wants to justify why a play in on the roster, which is why Gabriel Arias keeps getting chance after chance after chance. Our guess is the powers that be look at Arias’ power and his arm and just can’t quit him. Even though he continues to have contact issues.
We aren’t a Vogt enthusiast, he’s fine but not a great manager (yes, we know two Manager of the Year Awards) but his best trait is he has all the players rowing in the same direction. He keeps that clubhouse together and he communicates well with his players. But know the role of the skipper has changed greatly in the last 25 years in baseball.
It’s very much an organizational game. Sadly, the manager doesn’t have the same juice.