While NBA Players Have Power, Who Is Worrying About The League?

The NBA off-season reached its zenith Friday when Kawhi Leonard made his decision, going to the Los Angeles Clippers as a free agent, after the Clippers made a trade bringing Paul George to LA from Oklahoma City.

So, there aren’t any “superteams”, like the Golden State Warriors the past few seasons, nor like the Boston Celtics of the late 2000’s, or the Miami Heat earlier this decade.

But there are a decided shifting of great players to major markets. The five players who made the NBA’s top three all league teams and moved this off-season, all went to big market teams.

Now, some were already on big city squads, like Kawhi Leonard going from Toronto to LA, and Kyrie Irving going from Boston to Brooklyn.

But George went from Oklahoma City to the Clippers and Kemba Walker went from Charlotte to Boston.

So, the only players on small market teams remaining on the first, second, or third team All-NBA squads are Nikola Jokic (Denver), the reigning MVP, Giannis Antetokounmpo (Milwaukee), Damian Lillard (Portland), Rudy Gobert (Utah), and Blake Griffin (Detroit).

The year before, Anthony Davis and Jimmy Butler were listed and both of them moved to big markets (Lakers and Heat, respectively).

This is not meant to criticize the players. They have earned the right to free agency, and because of that, they earned the right to play where they choose.

The question is how this affects the league, which the players don’t and shouldn’t worry about.

The NBA is without a doubt, a multi-billion dollar business, and the players are the reason for that. They are the league, and the names are recognizable by first name or nickname: LeBron, Kawhi, Steph, KD, Giannis, etc.

However, if all of the league’s superstars gravitate to big markets and warm weather climates, how does that affect the Association?

Part of the reason the NBA makes a lot of money is it has 28 markets (two teams in Los Angeles and New York). Now, the younger fans are more attracted to players rather franchises, but the league is helped by those stars traveling to 28 cities around North America.

What would happen if eventually, four of those franchises went away because attendance fall off, mainly because the people who can afford tickets to NBA games figure out their franchises don’t have any chance to be competitive in the long term.

Or four of those teams relocated to let’s say, southern California or the New York metropolitan area, again reducing the number of markets to draw fans?

Is that good for the health of the NBA?

Again, the league has become global, so maybe it doesn’t matter, and perhaps they will eventually relocate smaller American markets to Europe, Mexico, or other countries, growing the NBA in that matter.

We aren’t going to say the championship the Cavaliers won in 2016 will be the last one by a smaller market because the Bucks still have Antetokounmpo, and that makes them a threat to get a title.

But the growing number of players looking to get out of smaller cities continues to grow. And let’s face it, if James isn’t from northeast Ohio, does he come back from 2014-15 to 2017-18 and the Cavaliers get to raise a banner?

As we said, it’s not the players’ job to worry about the league, but someone should be concerned. Shouldn’t that be the commissioner? Again, maybe he just doesn’t care about the middle of the country.

When Things In Sports Get Too Easy

There is a cliché in sports that offense sells tickets, but defense wins championships. But is that still true?

Particularly in the sports of football and basketball, nearly every rule change in the past several years has been designed to help scoring. Fans like to see points on the scoreboard.

But when does it become too much?

Have both sports reached the point where things have come too easy.

In football, most of the rule changes have involved the passing game. What has happened, in our opinion, is that it has become ridiculously easy to throw the football.

In the late 70’s and early 80’s, 4000 yards passing was the gold standard.

When Brian Sipe and Dan Fouts threw for over that number in 1980, it was a huge amount of yardage. We remember ABC promoting a Monday Night Football game between the Browns and Chargers as “aerial warfare”.

This past season, 12 quarterbacks had over 4000 passing yards, and three more were right on the doorstep.

And this doesn’t take into account the large number of big gains as a result of defensive pass interference. It seems that most of the time, the receiver and the defensive back are both pushing and shoving, but the defense draws the flag.

In a playoff game this year between the Patriots and Chiefs, New England threw the football on their first 14 plays.

Yes, we realize they may have the greatest QB of all time in Tom Brady, but the reason they threw the ball this much, is that it is easy to move the ball through the air.

Too easy.

It’s time to let the secondaries around the league to play defense a little bit. This is not to say the NFL should go back to the time when players like Mel Blount could club a receiver off the line, and not allow them in the pattern at all, but let’s make professional football a little less like the touch football you played in the street as a kid.

In basketball, after the game was becoming too physical in the 90’s, led by Pat Riley’s overly physical New York Knicks, the NBA felt they needed to do something to get the game back to its free flowing roots.

So, they limited the contact allowed when guarding players on the perimeter.

Now, small quick players are virtually unguardable.

Here are some of the top 15 scorers right now in the NBA: Stephan Curry (1st), James Harden (2nd), Damien Lillard (6th), Russell Westbrook (7th), Isaiah Thomas (12th) and Kyle Lowry (15th).

That would be 40% of the league top scorers are basically small guys who can shoot, penetrate, and have the ball in their hands most of the time.

Basketball is a sport dominated by big men, but they are quickly being made obsolete in today’s game.

Is that good for the game? We would say no because there isn’t a penalty for playing small.

When the Cavs play Golden State, their smaller players are allowed to bang LeBron James when he gets in the paint, because the game is officiated differently for inside players than guys who play outside.

We aren’t advocating slamming smaller players to the floor when they drive to the basket, but allowing perimeter defenders to maintain some contact with these guys without being whistled might be appropriate.

Both leagues will tell you everything is fine based on ratings and attendance, and we get that. However, fans want to see professional athletes having to struggle at times too.

Only the best should make the game look easy.

Now, it seems anyone can.

Some Warriors Envy Grips Cavs’ Fans

We believe there is a divide among older professional basketball fans and those under the age of 30 years old, and it concerns the Golden State Warriors.

Older fans think the wide open, shoot the three point shot at all costs way is a fad, and teams that do this on a regular basis won’t be able to win consistently.

Younger fans love Stephan Curry and his style of play, which included pulling up on fast breaks to shoot threes instead of taking the ball to the basket.

The latter’s opinion has been buoyed by the Warriors triumph over a depleted Cavaliers’ team in last year’s Finals, and by Golden State’s 14-0 start this season.

First of all, there isn’t as much difference between the two teams as you think. While the Warriors rank 2nd in the NBA in three point shots attempted (actually Houston is first proving that it is the players, not the system), the Cavs are 5th in the league.

The difference is Golden State is making 41% of those shots thus far. And they made 40% a year ago.

The more experienced fans (of which group we belong to), would love to see opposing teams get physical with Curry, Klay Thompson, and the other Warriors.

But Golden State is a very good defensive team too, holding their opponents to an NBA low .458 field goal percentage against.

We believe this is because other teams try to play the Warriors’ game against them, and they simply aren’t as good. This results in bad shots for opponents.

In last year’s championship series, the wine and gold did not fall into that trap. They pounded the ball inside, and while the Warriors are long, they don’t have a lot of bulk, so you can attack them at the rim.

And let’s not forget that Steve Kerr’s crew did have some luck in the playoffs, getting wins over New Orleans (without Jrue Holliday), Memphis (Mike Conley was hurt), Houston (no Patrick Beverley to harass Curry), and of course, Cleveland without Kevin Love for the entire series, and Kyrie Irving for the last five games.

That’s not to minimize the title, but it is pointing out the facts.

Our point is the NBA season is about a month in and already we are hearing how the Cavaliers should do things like the Warriors.

Especially, when it comes down to handling minutes.

LeBron James is averaging 36.2 minutes per game, but some of that is because of the double overtime game vs. Milwaukee where James logged a season high 45 minutes.

In reality, of the 13 games Cleveland has played, James has totaled 36 or more minutes just six times.

In the Warriors’ 14 games, Curry has been on the floor 36 or more minutes nine times.

Curry is averaging 35.6 minutes per night, and has taken the most shots in the NBA this season. Will that take its toll as the season goes on?

Look, the Warriors are very good. They are the defending champions. And they are about to tie an NBA record for the best start ever if they win their next game to go 15-0.

Meanwhile, the Cavs have gotten off to a great start too at 10-3, and last night they easily defeated their opponent in the Eastern Conference finals a year ago, without Irving, Iman Shumpert, Mo Williams, and Timofey Mozgov.

Three of those players were starters in the conference finals a year ago.

So, don’t envy the Warriors, but instead, respect what the Cavs are doing despite playing all season without two of their top ten players, and now they won’t have four of those guys for the next couple of games.

Being the best team in November and December doesn’t get you anything.

David Blatt, LeBron James, and the Cavaliers are using the San Antonio model. It is better to be playing well in March and April.

That doesn’t mean Golden State can’t sustain it, but we will say if they can, they may be the greatest team of all time.

It’s Not Easy Being Blatt

It appears that as long as LeBron James is on the Cleveland Cavaliers, David Blatt will be a lightning rod.

In preseason discussions about the NBA, and when the question of what could derail the Cavs’ hopes of getting back to The Finals, the answer inevitably was either health or the head coach.

Apparently, getting a team with two injured all-stars to the brink of championship doesn’t gain you any respect from the NBA media intelligentsia.

Look, we understand that is life for a coach who has LeBron James on their team. James gets the credit if the team wins, and the coach and/or general manager take the heat if the squad falls short of a title.

We are also pretty sure that Blatt understands this as well.

Still, it’s incredible that the criticism of the Cavaliers’ coach has continued into the beginning of a new season.

We understand that Blatt’s only been in the NBA for a year, and whether you discount all of the international experience the man has, there should be no question that he has been around the game a long, long time, and he understands the game of basketball.

Is the NBA game different? Of course. Is the NBA a players’ league? Absolutely.

But if you know the game, you know the game.

And Blatt knows and understands the sport, and his team’s have been pretty successful over the years.

He doesn’t get any credit for transforming the Cavs into the best defensive team in the playoffs last year. And when J.R. Smith tells the media he would walk through a wall for Blatt, you can almost see people’s eyes roll.

Kyrie Irving has spoken glowingly about Blatt in the past, and men who played for him overseas have given him glowing reviews.

However, we guess none of that matters until LeBron James says it, and that’s probably never going to happen, because it’s never happened before at the professional level.

James did repeat many times during the post-season a year ago that the coaching staff gave them an excellent game plan, and it was up to the players to carry it out.

And when the Cavs had the ball with 10 seconds remaining in the season opener against the Bulls, it appeared that James and Blatt were discussing the final play and looked to be in agreement.

It won’t end until the wine and gold win the final game of the season, hoisted the Larry O’Brien Trophy, and have a parade down Euclid Avenue.

Even then, some media crackpot, probably from ESPN, will say that Blatt will be on the hot seat if the Cavs don’t get off to a good start.

Blatt is an outsider from the NBA circle, and he doesn’t have the best relationship with the press, mostly because he knows that he knows more about the game than they do, and isn’t shy about letting them know that.

We know people who are friendly with the media get a fairer shake (see Shapiro, Mark).

The criticism of David Blatt is getting out of hand. If the Cavs are 10-15 and aren’t playing hard, then he should be on the hot seat. But, the folks who cover the NBA had him out last year win or lose in The Finals, but here he is back strolling the sidelines.

And if LeBron wanted him out, the guess here is he would be out.

James may not think he’s the greatest coach, but he apparently doesn’t think Blatt is a hindrance to winning.

Until they start losing, or don’t win a title because of his coaching, let’s keep the narrative that David Blatt can’t coach out of the news.

Except that will never happen.

Why Stevens Has Better Rep Than Blatt

One of the story lines in the first round playoff series between the Cavaliers and Celtics is the impact of the young, basketball genius coach of Boston, Brad Stevens.

This isn’t to say Stevens hasn’t earned his reputation as one of the game’s best young minds.

He took a mid major program in Butler, from the same league as Cleveland State, to the NCAA Tournament Championship game two years in a row, losing to Duke and Connecticut, two of the sports’ power programs.

That said, in the first loss by a 61-59 score to Coach K’s Blue Devils, Stevens had the best player on the floor in Gordon Hayward, who averaged 19.3 points per game for Utah this season.

Getting to two straight finals is a tremendous accomplishment to be sure, and to do it without multiple McDonald’s All American high school players shows Stevens did a great coaching job.

And he’s done a very good job this year in Boston. Let’s face it, there isn’t one player who starts for the Celtics that would start for the Cavs, yet, the Celts had the second best record in the Eastern Conference after the all-star game.

Only the Cavs were better.

So Stevens has done a tremendous job with limited talent of getting the most out of his talent and getting his players to buy in and play hard every night.

He’s made his teams over achieve.

We will never know that about David Blatt as long as he has LeBron James, Kyrie Irving, and Kevin Love on the roster.

So, the narrative is that Stevens is a better coach, the boy wonder of basketball, and he will out scheme Blatt and keep his team in every game.

That’s not fair to Blatt.

Heck, for all we know, Stevens may be the heir apparent to Larry Brown as the best basketball mind in the country, but the comparison with Blatt isn’t a fair one because the Cavs’ coach has the talent, and hopefully (for fans and Blatt alike), we will never find out what kind of record he could squeeze out of the Boston roster.

And when you coach a very talented team, it is very difficult to get credit, or be considered a coaching genius.

Gregg Popovich gets a ton of credit because of the way the San Antonio Spurs play, and because people refuse to acknowledge that Tim Duncan is one of the game’s all time greats. And Popovich has gotten a lot out of guys cast aside by other teams, like Boris Diaw, Danny Green, etc.

We have always “pooh-poohed” Phil Jackson’s coaching greatness because he never coached a team that didn’t have a great player on it. All of his title teams had Michael Jordan, Shaquille O’Neal, and/or Kobe Bryant on the roster.

Blatt will never get any credit for the Cavaliers being successful because LeBron James is on the team, and he’s still the best player in the league.

Perhaps if he had the team he was hired to coach (no James, no Love) and guided the wine and gold to the playoffs, he would have the reputation as a great coach. But he didn’t. That doesn’t make him a coach who isn’t competent, it just makes him fortunate.

Even if the Cavaliers win a title this summer, the credit will go to the players. And the only credit David Blatt will get will be that he didn’t screw it up.