Cavs Should Be Trying To Get Simmons, He’s Really Good

There has been a lot of discussion lately about the Cleveland Cavaliers trading for disgruntled Philadelphia 76ers’ star Ben Simmons.

Should the Cavs be interested? What would they have to give up? Would it improve the roster for the upcoming season?

First, let’s say Simmons is a very talented player, being elected to three all star teams in his first four seasons in the league. The consensus around the Association is that he is probably in the top 25-30 players in the league right now.

Based on that, Koby Altman should be interested in bringing him to Cleveland. It says here he would be the best player on the team the minute he put on the wine and gold.

Let us also say right now that we doubt such a trade will involve the Cavaliers. But it is fun to speculate.

The main rap against the former first overall pick in the 2016 NBA Draft is his shooting ability, notably from long distance. He has famously (or maybe infamously) taken just 34 shots from behind the arc in his four years in the NBA, making just five.

On the other hand, he has made 56% of his field goal attempts in his career, so he knows where he needs to be on the court to score. There’s nothing wrong with that. We have seen many players throughout the league fire up shots that have little chance of going in, and continue to take those bad shots.

Sometimes, selectivity is a good thing.

Other than shooting, Simmons does everything else very well. He averages 7.7 assists per game at 6’11” and grabs 8.1 boards per contest in his four year career. He’s also a very good defense player, making first team All-Defense in each of the last two seasons.

We understand there is a section of basketball fans out there that focus on one thing, scoring. Unfortunately, there is way more to the game than that and Ben Simmons is very good at doing all of those things. He just isn’t a very good shooter from outside the paint.

As for a potential trade to Cleveland, it is hard to see what Philadelphia would want from the Cavs, and in turn, would Altman give up the players. For example, we are sure Philly would ask for Darius Garland, but we would not give him up.

There has been recent speculation that the Sixers would be interested in newly acquired Lauri Markkanen, but in that case Altman would be giving up a three point threat (something Cleveland needs) for someone who is not. We would prefer not to give up the newest Cavalier.

As for Collin Sexton, who is probably the most marketable player the Cavs have, we would certainly be willing to move him in a package for Simmons, but it’s tough to see a fit for the 76ers. Joel Embiid and Tobias Harris are the primary scorers there, so would Sexton get the shots he is accustomed to?

And Kevin Love would seem to be useful as a sniper off the bench in Philadelphia, but you would have to add a whole lot to that package to get anyone to take on that contract.

Would Cedi Osman be of interest? Maybe. But again, anyone the Sixers are interested in is probably a good player, and the Cavs certainly need good players.

Again, we don’t expect anything to happen on this front, but adding Simmons to the roster would make the Cavaliers a better team. Adding a three time all star in his prime is always a good idea.

Cavs Add Talent, But Is The Fit Better?

Cavaliers’ GM Koby Altman made another move on Friday executing a sign and trade deal with free agent forward Lauri Markkanen, with fan favorite Larry Nance Jr. and a second round pick going to Portland in the deal.

The Cavs get younger in the transaction as Markkanen, who agreed to a four year deal with Cleveland, is just 24 years old and Nance will turn 29 on New Years Day.

First, let’s talk about the hometown player in Nance. We love his game. He has an old school game in that he does everything well. He averaged 9.5 points per game in his time with the Cavaliers, with 7.5 rebounds and almost three assists.

He was third on the team in assists last year, and might have been the second best passer on the team.

However, he also misses a lot of action. His high in games played since entering the league is 67, and last season, played in just 35 games due to illness and a broken hand.

He also has a game that fits better with a winning team, because he’s a complementary player. He passes, defends, block shots, and can finish at the rim. He will be a very good fit with the Trailblazers, a team trying to win.

Markkanen’s numbers have fallen off since his first two years with the Bulls, when he averaged 15.2 and then 18.7 points per game, and grabbed a career high 9.0 rebounds in his second season in Chicago.

In that second season, he averaged 15 shots per night, second to Zach LaVine. The next season, Chicago drafted Coby White in the first round and they became more of a guard oriented offense with LaVine getting two more shots per game and White taking more shots than the former 7th overall pick who played one season at Arizona.

Last year, he did raise his overall shooting percentage to 48% (his career mark is 44%) and his three point shooting to 40.2% (36.6% lifetime). If that’s a trend, that’s something the wine and gold could really use, as they had the league’s worst shooting from beyond the arc.

Where does he play? Our thought is maybe he starts at power forward giving J.B. Bickerstaff the option of bring rookie Evan Mobley off the bench in his rookie season, backing up at both center and power forward.

We understand there is pressure to start the third overall pick, but as we have discussed, Mobley needs to put on some weight and get stronger, so maybe this is good for his development.

Again, we love what Nance gives you, but really Markkanen is the better player.

We do have a problem with Altman giving up a draft pick, albeit a second rounder. When you are building, you need draft capital, and second round picks can be valuable.

Getting Markkanen really emphasizes the point that there is no role or spot for Kevin Love on the roster and the team would be better off at this point to buyout the veteran. Thank him for his contributions and his part on the championship team, but let him part on decent terms.

This can’t be the last move by Altman either. The Cavs still have an odd fit of players, with small guards and three seven footers who need playing time. The also still need a legitimate small forward, one who can score. Our feeling continues to be that Isaac Okoro’s size makes him a #2 guard.

In terms of talent, the Cavs are better than they were yesterday. In terms of fit? It’s still an weird mix.

We also understand the sadness seeing Nance go, someone who grew up here, was great in the community, and was a link to when the Cavaliers were very good.