A Little Disappointed in Acta

 

As the Cleveland Indians limp their way to the halfway point of the season, it’s a good time to review the performance or lack of it regarding this baseball team.

 

Yes, there have been injuries to key players Asdrubal Cabrera and Grady Sizemore, but that doesn’t excuse the poor fundamentals, poor situational hitting, and lack of strike throwing we have seen from the team all year long.

 

It’s also time to take a look at Manny Acta’s managerial style, and quite frankly he has been as disappointing as his team’s record. 

 

It was thought Acta would not tolerate the mistakes that seem to occur daily with this baseball team.  However, the same players keep going out there every day, seemingly without a penalty. 

 

They complain about pitchers who don’t throw strikes, and then they promote someone who has walked 20 and struck out 13 in AAA like Aaron Laffey. 

 

This is a team that needs leadership.  There are no veteran players with a history of winning or who seem vocal enough to communicate with the young players to tell them this losing isn’t acceptable.  It seems like the culture of losing has infected this organization, and that has to change.

 

Acta has also disappointed because he still seems to follow the company line on certain matters.  For example, why is Kerry Wood still closing games?  Is it because the owners are paying him a ton of money?  He certainly hasn’t earned that spot with his pitching.

 

Wood has pitched in 17 games so far this season.  He has recorded a 1-2-3 inning exactly three times in those 17 appearances.  That’s not a guy who should be closing games.  The Tribe is trying to showcase him, but no one will want him as a closer, so why not use him in a set up role, and let Chris Perez close. 

 

Wednesday night’s game was a perfect example of Wood’s problems.  Brian Schneider led off for the Phillies and he came in with an average around .220.  Wood promptly walked him on a 3-2 pitch. 

 

Dude, you throw 97 miles per hour, why not fire a fastball right down the middle and see if the guy can hit it?  Even if Schneider hits one out, which he did earlier in the game, his first of the year, it’s still a tie game.  You cannot walk a hitter like that.

 

The defensive has joined the lack of hitting and pitching as things that make this ballclub hard to watch.  Russell Branyan compounds his lack of contact (48 strikeouts in 161 at bats) with abysmal defense at 1B.  He charges bunts at the wrong time, he throws to the wrong base, he doesn’t catch balls thrown to him.  Why did we sign him again?

 

It seems like Acta is afraid to do something different, although his hands are tied by the dormant front office, who continues to act like they are smarter than everybody else.

 

Why is there a middle infielder on the roster that is hitting .150 in over 100 at bats?  Why is Andy Marte on the roster if he is going to play once a week when the Tribe faces a southpaw?  Why are there two ineffective left-handed relievers on the roster? 

 

It really doesn’t help the skipper when he is hamstrung by what he has to work with from the GM.

 

Still, it wouldn’t hurt if Acta took a sterner approach with this group of players.  Without a veteran leader on the club, the manager and coaching staff should take more of a role in teaching these young players what is right and what is wrong.

 

MW

Can the Cavs Change the Offense?

 

This space has been very critical of the Cavaliers’ offense under Mike Brown.  He relied too much on LeBron James’ ability to get to the basket, draw defenders, and find open teammates.  When a team like Boston stopped James’ penetration, the attack was ground to a halt.

 

However, how much of that was the wish of #23, who perhaps wanted the ball in his hands at all times. 

 

Remember, the Mo Williams that played in Milwaukee was a much different player than the one who played here the past two years.  The Williams who played against the Cavs and gave them fits, was a guy who would break down a defense, get into the lane and cause problems.

 

That’s not the guy we saw in Cleveland the past two seasons. 

 

Either James or Brown made all other offensive players spot up three point shooters.

 

The same thing said about Williams can be said about Anthony Parker and Jamario Moon.  When the wine and gold were forced into a half court set, they stood in one spot, waited for penetration, and were expected to make threes.

 

So it’s the chicken or the egg.  Did LeBron James dominate the ball because there was no good game plan in half court situations, or was there no good game plan in the half court because James dominated the ball? 

 

If it’s the former and #23 remains a Cav, then a new coach can greatly impact the offense.  If it’s the latter and LBJ stays here, no matter who new GM Chris Grant trades for or signs, Cleveland will look much the same on offense.

 

Without a difference in the offensive game plan, the Cavaliers can keep James, trade for Monta Ellis, and sign Chris Bosh and Joe Johnson, and there is still going to be problems when the wine and gold have the ball in the half court. 

 

NOTE:  We understand that will not work under any salary cap.

 

Recently, WKNR’s Michael Reghi has suggested that if the problem is James wanting to monopolize the ball, then the Cavs should go ahead and make #23 the point guard and pursue other options at small forward.  However, they will still need some motion in the attack.  It cannot be LBJ with the ball and everyone else hanging around the three-point line.

 

And if James needs to have the ball whether it is in Cleveland or somewhere else, it limits some of the teams he is supposedly looking at. 

 

Chicago has Derrick Rose, who also needs the ball.  Miami has Dewayne Wade, who needs the ball.  Heck, Baron Davis is used to having the ball with the Clippers.  If LeBron James goes to any of these places, it’s not going to be a good fit, basketball wise.

 

Regardless of whether James stays or not, the Cleveland Cavaliers need a change offensively.  In the playoffs, you have to have the ability to get the ball to people where they need it to be effective.  The current set up of a guy in the post, a guy with the ball, and three guys around the arc don’t work against the better teams. 

 

Getting a different point guard won’t change anything; neither will getting a power forward.  The scheme has to change for players to be effective.

 

JK 

Bad in All Phases

 
The Cleveland Indians tried to fool us by knocking off Boston the last two games of a four game series, and then winning the first two games against the Washington Nationals last weekend.  That made four straight wins.  Maybe adding Carlos Santana would somewhat salvage this hopeless season?
 
Since then, the Tribe has lost six of seven to the Nationals, Mets, and the horrible Pittsburgh Pirates mostly by playing awful defense.  That goes along with an offense that ranks near the bottom of the American League, and a pitching staff that ranks the same.
 
Hitting, pitching, and defense…this team is terrible at all of them.
 
Shouldn’t there be something Manny Acta can hang his hat on?
 
Last Sunday (in the Steven Strasburg game), Trevor Crowe took a bad route to a ball hit to centerfield to turn a 4-1 deficit into 6-1.  In the first game of the Mets’ series, the Tribe parlayed bad glove work into a five run inning, when New York hit just two balls out of the infield, and one of those was Ike Davis’ two run homer. 
 
In the past week, opponents have scored from second base twice, TWICE!, on infield hits to Jason Donald at shortstop.  Donald should be playing 2B with Anderson Hernandez at SS, and Luis Valbuena being sent to Columbus to regain his confidence. 
 
At first base, Russell Branyan is showing that perhaps a statue would be better defensively at the position.  In the Met series, he charged on a bunt in front of the plate that Santana easily fielded, and yesterday missed a throw from Justin Masterson that wasn’t even in the dirt. 
 
When you don’t have a pitching staff that has a lot of swing and miss capabilities, you better be good defensively, and the Cleveland Indians aren’t.  Yes, Asdrubal Cabrera and Grady Sizemore are both good gloves and are out of the lineup, but doesn’t the organization have replacements that can make the basic plays?
 
And speaking of not having power arms in the rotation, did anybody check out Aaron Laffey’s outing Saturday night for Columbus?  Laffey, who may replace David Huff as a starter this weekend against Cincinnati, walked seven in 5-1/3 innings against Pawtucket.  When you don’t have overpowering stuff, you must throw strikes.  This continues to elude the southpaw, who should not be the alternative for Huff.  Make him get in the strike zone consistently before he gets promoted.
 
Call up Carlos Carrasco instead or even Josh Tomlin.  Tomlin would require being added to the 40 man roster, while perhaps Carrasco’s up and down performance in AAA is due to being bored since he’s been at that level for a year and a half. 
 
Tomlin deserves the promotion more.
 
However, it’s not going to make a difference who pitches unless a better defensive club is behind him. 
 
KM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

What's An Owner to Do?

 

It’s tough to own a professional sports franchise.  Yes, the people that are owners have a considerable amount of money, and that’s not tough at all, but these people thrust themselves into the public eye when they get involved in professional sports.

 

Who had ever heard of Dan Gilbert and Larry Dolan before they purchased the Cavaliers and Indians, respectively?  Do you really think Randy Lerner likes picking up a newspaper (or looking up stuff on the internet) and reading that he’s an idiot because the Browns aren’t winning?

 

Of course they don’t, but they put themselves into that position when they bought in.

 

There is also a double standard when it comes to getting involved for owners.

 

Currently, Gilbert is under fire from some corners for being the driving force behind the dismissal of coach Mike Brown and the resignation of GM Danny Ferry.  Meanwhile, the Dolan’s get heat for trusting the judgment of GM Mark Shapiro. 

 

It seems they can’t win on how to handle their franchises if their teams aren’t winning.

 

The ideal thing is for the owner to hire the right people and then step back and let the qualified staff run the team.  This worked for Dick Jacobs with the Indians.  When Jacobs bought the team, he brought in the highly regarded Hank Peters, who hired someone who worked with him in the Oriole organization in John Hart.

 

Hart proved to be the man who turned the Tribe from a laughing stock into one of the sports’ best teams from 1994-2001.  Jacobs let Hart do his thing, he was successful, and the owner was very popular with the fans.

 

Dolan puts his trust in Mark Shapiro, who hasn’t had the same record as his predecessor.  So, the fans want to know why the owner gives his GM so much rope.  At some point, the guy who pays the bills has to step in and make a change.

 

Granted, the Cavaliers have been very successful over Ferry and Brown’s five years together.  They got the wine and gold to the NBA Finals once, and had the league’s best regular season the past two seasons.  But they didn’t accomplish the one thing the owner wants more than anything, a world championship. 

 

And you could argue that Brown’s coaching in the playoffs was one of the reasons the Larry O’Brien Trophy hasn’t been hoisted in Cleveland the past two seasons. 

 

Odd defensive alignments hurt the wine and gold against Orlando in 2009, and the lack of an offensive game plan didn’t help the team versus the Celtics this past season.

 

After Tom Izzo turned down the Cavs’ job, Gilbert’s critics said he shouldn’t have fired Brown without having a better candidate.  They are wrong.  Brown deserved to be let go because he did a poor job of getting his squad ready to play a good defensive team, and not utilizing some talent (read:  Antawn Jamison) properly.

 

Brown’s dismissal led to Ferry’s resignation, make no mistake about that. 

 

So basically, Dan Gilbert saw what everyone else did regarding the coach and decided he had to do something.  Which is his right to do as the guy who signs the checks.  The GM was stubborn and didn’t want to go along with it, which is his right. 

 

Now Gilbert is regarded as a meddling owner, and is being compared to Daniel Snyder, the Washington Redskins owner, who is the poster boy for guys not understanding the sport he is involved in.

 

The Cavaliers’ owner should get the benefit of the doubt here.  He gave Ferry and Brown five years.  That would be a lifetime for guys like Snyder and the George Steinbrenner Yankees of the 1970-80’s. 

 

Sometimes these guys have to make tough decisions, but there is a fine line between being too active and being too passive if you own a professional sports franchise.

 

MW 

Who Else for Cavs' Coach

 

Now that Tom Izzo has spurned Dan Gilbert’s advances to coach the Cleveland Cavaliers, what is the next step for a franchise that is being characterized as in chaos?  Who will be the next candidate to step forward as the next coach of the wine and gold?

 

First, the franchise is not in disarray, it’s just being run differently.  Gilbert is being portrayed as impetuous, but really, he allowed Danny Ferry to run the organization one way for five years, and he didn’t achieve the ultimate reward, a championship. 

 

It’s Gilbert who stands to lose a great deal if LeBron James decides to go elsewhere in free agency, so why shouldn’t he roll up his sleeves and try to make a bold move.  The value of his investment is at stake, so why wouldn’t he want to be heavily involved.

 

However, the pickings are slim as far as coaching candidates are concerned with Izzo out of the picture. 

 

Many have suggested the owner’s next target is former Net and Hornet coach Byron Scott, but he may be waiting to see if his dream job, head coach of the Lakers, opens up before making a decision.  If Phil Jackson were not back, Scott would be a prime candidate for that job. 

 

Still, Scott has been fired twice in the past seven years.  Is a retread candidate the best fit for the Cavaliers?

 

It would be preferable to hiring an unproven assistant coach, but is Scott the correct choice?

 

Scott has handled star players (Jason Kidd and Chris Paul), took New Jersey to The Finals twice, but you can’t forget that when he was fired by the Nets, Lawrence Frank took over and directed the team to a long winning streak.  Obviously, Scott is a guy who burns bright right away, but the players seem to tire of him very quickly.

 

So, who else is there?  Mo Cheeks is two games below .500 for his coaching career, and has taken three teams to the playoffs, winning 50 games once with Portland in second year at the helm.  He was relieved of his job with the Sixers last season after 23 games.

 

What about Mike Dunleavy, whose record is below .500 lifetime (613-716), but led the Lakers to The Finals in 1991, and even took the Clippers to the playoffs and a series win in 2006.  He has had three 50-win campaigns. 

 

What about Mike Fratello, the Czar of the Telestrator, who is 667-548 for his career, and has four 50 win seasons, all with the Dominique Wilkins led Hawks, but also took the Grizzlies to the playoffs in 2005 and 2006.  He’s now 63 years old, but anyone who watches him on TNT or NBA-TV knows he is fully in touch with today’s game. 

 

The one assistant who has been mentioned is Lakers’ aide Brian Shaw, whose future is also tied into what will happen with Phil Jackson in Los Angeles.  It is doubtful that the Cavs will turn to another first time head coach with the uncertainty of James’ future, and the need to make a big splash.

 

Jeff Van Gundy talks a good game on television, but was known more for a slowdown style with the Knicks and Rockets, which isn’t a good fit if James re-signs.

 

The ball is clearly in Gilbert’s court.  He accepted the burden of keeping his team a championship contender, and his choice of a coach could ultimately be enough to keep the franchise player in town. 

 

Dan Gilbert has the most to lose by making a bad decision.  My guess is he wouldn’t want it any other way.

 

JK

More Youth Should Follow Santana

 

If nothing else, Sunday’s crowd of over 32,000 people who showed up to watch Washington’s Steven Strasburg pitch showed that Cleveland baseball fans will pay to watch something worth their time.  The Dolan family should take note.

 

Another reason for some resurgent interest in the Tribe is the call up of catcher Carlos Santana.  Finally!  The switch-hitting back stop belted his first career home run on Saturday, and showed he earned Manny Acta’s confidence by being inserted in the third spot in the batting order, usually reserved for the team’s best hitters. 

 

By the way, the manner in which Santana caught the games, including those by veteran hurler Jake Westbrook, and the tough to handle stuff of Fausto Carmona, showed that the front office’s concerns about his defense were baloney, and the real reason Santana wasn’t here had everything to do with his accumulating service time.

 

This should be just the first of several moves made with prospects over the next few months.  Matt La Porta is raking down at Columbus with 5 home runs in 23 at bats, and will be brought back up to play every day after Russell Branyan is dealt to a contending ballclub looking for pop from the left side. 

 

However, the other big prospect acquired for C.C. Sabathia isn’t faring as well.  Michael Brantley still has just a .351 slugging percentage at Columbus and has only seven stolen bases.  Until he can either learn to drive the ball, and that means doubles and triples, or starts stealing bases at a better pace, he can’t be a regular player in the majors.

 

Brantley is just 23 years old, so it’s not time to give up on him just yet, but he needs to step his game up to be an everyday player in the big leagues.

 

Austin Kearns will probably remain in the lineup all season because Brantley isn’t ready.

 

Another prospect that should be on the fast track is Lonnie Chisenhall, currently at Akron.  Since coming back a shoulder problem in May, Chisenhall has been red hot, bringing his season totals to 5 HR and 23 RBI’s to go with a .292 batting average and an 811 OPS. 

 

If Chisenhall stays hot through the middle of July, he should be the next one going to Columbus to get some AAA action.  And if he’s successful in Columbus, he should get a September call up to the big club. 

 

The Indians will probably site Chisenhall’s age, he won’t turn 22 until October 4th, as a reason not to give him a shot, but once again, it will be more about service time (read:  $$$). 

 

However, Jhonny Peralta likely not be back next season because he is a free agent, so the Tribe needs a third baseman for 2011.  If Chisenhall can handle the job, who cares how old he is.  Let him become a cornerstone of this franchise along with Santana, La Porta, Asdrubal Cabrera, and Shin-Soo Choo.  And the sooner, the better.

 

If you haven’t noticed, the Indians are moving their second base prospects through the organization as well.  They recently moved Cord Phelps up to Columbus, and Jason Kipnis up to Akron. 

 

Phelps, 23, is a switch hitter that was batting .296 in AA, with 2 HR, 23 RBI, and a 743 OPS.

 

Kipnis, also 23, and regarded as the better prospect, swings from the left side, and was batting .300 in Kinston, with 6 HR, 31 RBI’s and an 865 OPS.  Kipnis was an outfielder at Arizona State and was converted to the infield last season.

 

Luis Valbuena’s continuing struggles probably contributed to the moves of both players.

 

The time is right for a youth movement in Cleveland.  The fans would actually look forward to having some hope, and seeing young players get a shot. 

 

KM

Izzo the Right Man?

 

The news that Tom Izzo may just be the next coach of the Cavaliers is shocking, but mostly because it’s hard to believe Izzo would leave a program he has built into one of the country’s best college basketball teams year in and year out.

 

Many critics are pointing out the failure rate of college coaches going to the pros, such as Mike Montgomery, John Calipari, and P.J. Carlesimo.  However, the thing that most of these people don’t realize is that those guys all took over poor teams. 

 

If LeBron James stays with the Cavs for the 2010 season and beyond, the wine and gold would still be one of the NBA’s elite teams.

 

Calipari took over New Jersey in 1996-97 with the Nets coming off a 30-52 record.  He went 26-56 in his first year, but took the team to the playoffs in year two with a 43-39 record.  He was fired after a 3-17 start the following year.  The key additions for the second year were rookie Keith Van Horn and guard Sam Cassell.

 

The best players on those teams were Cassell, Van Horn, Kendall Gill, and Kerry Kittles, a rookie in Calipari’s first year.

 

Montgomery took over Golden State after years of 38 and 37 wins under Eric Musselman.  The Warriors won 34 games in each of Montgomery’s two seasons, so basically the team wasn’t very good before he got there and outside of one season (’07-’08) where they won 48 contests, the Warriors have been a lottery team.  

 

Those teams were very young, led by a group of 24 and 25 year olds such as Jason Richardson, Baron Davis, Troy Murphy, and Mike Dunleavy.  Perhaps Montgomery worked through the growing years, and Don Nelson reaped the benefits a few years later when the team went 48-34.

 

Carlesimo took over the best team, as the Trail Blazers went 47-35 the previous season under Rick Adelman, and was bounced the first round of the playoffs in Adelman’s last two seasons.  Under the former Seton Hall coach, the Blazers won 44, 44, and 49 games, and lost in the first round of the playoffs in each year. 

 

It certainly doesn’t look like Carlesimo was over matched.  He did have a well-publicized problem with Letrell Sprewell while the pair was in Golden State, but it looks like he did a solid job in Portland.

 

Others say the “profile” of a successful NBA coach these days is that of a former player, usually a successful one.  What is that profile based on?  There really haven’t been many different teams that have won titles in the past 25 years, as the Lakers, Celtics, Bulls, and Spurs have dominated the league.  And Phil Jackson has won 10 of those titles while coaching the best players in the sport (Jordan, O’Neal, Bryant).

 

The more realistic formula for a successful coach is to get a superstar player.  That’s more of the reason that a team wins than the playing experience of the coach.  Gregg Popovich has four rings to prove that theory.

 

Besides, prior to the days of Larry Bird and Magic Johnson, many coaches with college experience were successful in the NBA.  Bill Fitch built the Cavs into contenders after leaving Minnesota, and won a title with the Celtics.  Dick Motta won a championship with the Bullets.  John McLeod took Phoenix to The Finals after coaching at Oklahoma.

 

By the way, one of Fitch’s players at North Dakota became a pretty successful NBA coach…Phil Jackson. 

 

Tom Izzo is a very good coach.  Is he a good fit in the NBA?  Can he handle the idiosyncrasies of NBA players?  Can he handle coaching guys that make more than him?  We don’t know the answers to those questions.  However, he does know the game, and if he has talent he can win. 

 

It’s a bold move by Dan Gilbert to go after the Spartan head coach.  But isn’t that what we want from the guys who own our sports teams?

 

JK

Tribe Needs A Bold Move

 

It’s not like we didn’t advocate sending Matt LaPorta back to Columbus, in fact we talked about it a couple of weeks ago.  The centerpiece of the C.C. Sabathia trade needed to play everyday somewhere, it was just hoped that the Tribe would come to their senses and have it be with the big club.

 

Alas, and predictably, the front office decided to send him back to the AAA level. 

 

It is probable that LaPorta is there to play on a regular basis so he can be recalled soon, and be put back in the big league lineup to stay, but the way the Indians have handled this kid makes even casual fans shake their heads.

 

However, the handling of the young right-handed slugger shows how disjointed the Indians’ organization is.  They don’t want to admit they are rebuilding, but their fans think they are and that they should be.

 

There is no interest in this team because there are no exciting players, save for Shin-Soo Choo.  If the supporters of the team knew they were seeing future starts such as Carlos Santana, LaPorta, Carlos Carrasco, etc., there would be more interest because if the Tribe is to get back into contention soon, it would be because of those guys.

 

The management doesn’t want to admit anything because they are afraid it will affect attendance, but haven’t they noticed the growing numbers of empty seats at Progressive Field?  Apathy has already taken over, and the front office needs to slap the fans in the face with a bold move.

 

The move with LaPorta is exactly what Cleveland fans feared would happen when the club signed Russell Branyan.  The imagined need to play the strikeout prone slugger is costing the younger player valuable big league experience.  And everyone knows it is unlikely that Branyan will be back with the Tribe in 2011.

 

Cutting loose 2B Mark Grudzielanek is a good first step, even though the veteran did a solid job here.  However, a team that is 15 games under .500 having a 40-year-old infielder on the roster is ludicrous.  Having Grudzielanek on the opening day roster was something that was questioned here coming out of spring training because he can’t play any other position.

 

No one is expecting that Anderson Hernandez is going to come in and make an impact for this team, but he does balance the roster in that he’s a true utility guy, capable of playing multiple positions. 

 

Lou Marson is a good defensive catcher, but he’s hitting .193 with a 529 OPS.  That’s unacceptable at the big league level.  Is this front office seriously telling us that Carlos Santana’s defensive problems are so bad that it would overshadow the impact he could make offensively?

 

Meanwhile, the fans don’t see anything that interests them.  The best hitters on the team are Choo and Austin Kearns, who the team picked up off the scrap heap in the off-season.  No one thinks Kearns’ performance is sustainable over the long haul, and in fact, his month of May statistics were pretty pedestrian. 

 

The fans would give the franchise a pass this year if they were rebuilding, but instead they are getting steady doses of Branyan and Peralta.  The balance of this season should be about finding out who can play at this level and who can’t.  Instead, Tribe supporters are treated to watching a bunch of guys who have proven they aren’t anymore than below average major leaguers.

 

That’s why there are a lot of green empty seats in Progressive Field.

 

MW

Winds of Change at The Q

 
It was a bit of a surprise that Danny Ferry resigned as General Manager Friday afternoon.  Most people figured Ferry would stay on in his position particularly when he didn’t leave after the firing of Mike Brown.  Former assistant GM Chris Grant took over the GM duties Wednesday when Ferry officially left the organization.
 
Still, it’s not as though the management team for the Cavaliers is in chaos.  Grant came to the wine and gold at the same time as Ferry, and has been involved in the NBA for a long time.  And he and Ferry shared many of the same philosophies, so it’s not like a radical change has come to Quicken Loans Arena.
 
The guess here is the coaching situation is the reason Ferry and owner Dan Gilbert agreed to disagree, thus causing Ferry to clean out his desk and depart after five years as the GM.  The highlight of his tenure is no doubt the trip to the NBA Finals in 2007. 
 
However, Ferry wanted to have the ultimate say on all basketball decisions, and probably Gilbert was open to other options, such as bringing in a coach who might want that kind of power.  If you examine the trade Ferry made recently, it’s pretty clear that his vision and Mike Brown’s view were very different. 
 
Brown is, was, and always will be a defensive minded coach.  The additions of Shaquille O’Neal and Antawn Jamison brought in players who were more offensive minded players to take pressure off of LeBron James.  Gilbert likely saw that this didn’t work, and therefore he wants to bring in a coach who knows what it will take to complement James, if he remains with the team. 
 
The coach ultimately needs to make it work, and as Bill Parcells so famously said, if he’s making the dinner, he should get to buy the groceries.
 
And any coach with a record of success in the NBA will want to try to win with his type of players.  He’ll want the power to get things done, and with a GM having the iron fist, that wouldn’t be the case in Cleveland.
 
James is saying the right thing about having respect for Brown and Ferry, but really, the Cavs best chance to get him to stay in the wine and gold was to clean out the front office and start anew.
 
Now there are rumors about a possible trade to be made before the NBA draft that will start re-shaping the Cavaliers’ roster, and the new GM is the focal point of these moves.  It has been hinted that Cleveland is having discussions with a West Coast team, probably the Golden State Warriors, about a big deal which could involve a lottery pick.
 
The PD’s Brian Windhorst speculated that Mo Williams could be sent packing and that makes sense.  Williams has been very good in the regular season, but his lack of defense hurts the team in the playoffs, and he hasn’t made up for that with a stellar offensive game either.
 
Danny Ferry did a great job in his tenure with the Cavs.  They went to The Finals once, and made it to the conference finals another time.  Sometimes, a new perspective is needed in looking at a team.  Larry Dolan hasn’t learned this with his team, but Gilbert is willing to take the risk that this is what the Cavaliers need.
 
JK
 
 

Is Anyone Awake at Progressive Field?

 

If you are a fan of baseball in this city, you have a big problem.  It hasn’t even hit summer yet, and the season is over for all intents and purposes.  The Cleveland Indians’ record has dipped to 19-33, they’ve lost 13 of their last 17 games, and no one in the organization seems to care.

 

Manager Manny Acta’s relief corps is a mess, and for the third straight season, GM Mark Shapiro has assembled a bullpen that is horrible.  Let’s see, for the most part, this is a bullpen that cannot throw strikes, give up way too many hits, doesn’t have a lot of strikeout guys, and has only a couple of guys that the skipper can count on.

 

Other than that, they’re pretty good.

 

And now, one of the guys Acta had confidence in, Tony Sipp, has completely melted down over the last week, giving up 11 runs in the last inning he has pitched. 

 

Yet, nothing happens.

 

Someone needs to place a call to the Tribe front office to see if anyone is there.

 

Acta said Frank Herrman, who has a 0.31 ERA at Columbus, would get a look-see from the big club sometime this season.  When?  Perhaps when his ERA gets around 0.25?  Look, the guy can’t pitch any better in the minor leagues, and the Indians’ bullpen stinks.  Let’s get him up here right away.

 

Carlos Santana continues to assault International League pitching staffs, but all the organization talks about is his catching ability, or seeming lack of it.  If this management group were well known for developing prospects, their critique would be thought of more.  These guys think Rafael Perez is still an effective pitcher, so should we really take their word on Santana?

 

The saddest thing about this current group of Indians is that only two or three players who play regularly in this lineup will probably be on the team next season!  And one of them, Travis Hafner, is only “guaranteed” a spot because of his contract. 

 

Jason Donald could be a regular next season, but he has only a little over 50 at bats this season, so that might be a little bit of a stretch.

 

Branyan, Peralta, Kearns, Marson, Valbuena, Crowe.  All of these guys will have a tough time being in the 2011 starting lineup, some due to their contract status (Peralta and Branyan), the others because they simply aren’t good enough to hold big league jobs. 

 

Who assembled this team?  We can all cry about the lack of spending by the owners, but why isn’t more heat put on Shapiro, who put this collection of “talent” together.

 

The problem is that there seems to be no sense of urgency to try something else.  Why not try someone else?  When Andy Marte is healthy, why not play him at 3B instead of Peralta?  Why not play Matt La Porta everyday?  Why not see what Jordan Brown and/or Wes Hodges can do? 

 

The most frustrating thing for this fan is the inertia in the front office.  It appears that no one associated with this team, outside of the players and coaching staff have any interest at all in either winning or finding out who can play and who can’t.

 

The front office probably thinks having guys like Peralta and Branyan give the team a chance to win with their “veteran” presence.  However, these guys are bums.  They give the team nothing besides a roadblock to finding out whether a young guy can play in the big leagues. 

 

Baseball teams are selling either winning or hope; the fans of the Cleveland Indians have neither.  It’s only June 4th, and the baseball summer is over before it even starts.

 

KM